In this article we will address Dan Reed's 2019 documentary Leaving Neverland that features Wade Robson and James Safechuck and their sexual abuse allegations against the late Michael Jackson. Not just with children, but with adults as well.
Chapters: Problem: "Leaving Neverland" is blatantly and deliberately one-sided Claim 1: Wade Robson and James Safechuck did not have the opportunity to harmonize their stories. Leaving Neverland Facts reveals the truth behind the one-sided smear of Michael Jackson by director Dan Reed and his two admitted liars, Wade Robson and James Safechuck. A lot of people could have talked about that and refute the “grooming” portrayal of it.We have other examples of secretly taped phone conversations between Jackson and others, like this one between him and AIDS patient Again, such telephone calls were not unique to the Robsons and Safechucks, and not unique to children either. 99. The reason why this mistake is more significant than that, though, is that Safechuck’s allegation is that his sexual abuse started onSafechuck also alleges in his complaint that Jackson pressured and threatened him during his 2005 trial to give testimony for him. 7-day free trial for Live TV and 30-day free trial for Add-Ons valid for new and eligible existing subscribers only. FILE - In this Jan. 24, 2019, file photo, Wade Robson, from left, director Dan Reed and James Safechuck pose for a portrait to promote the film "Leaving Neverland" during the Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah. He took his mother’s jewelry and gifted it to his teachers. That is because neither of these men could produce a single piece of evidence that was actually incriminating.Instead, we learn about “love letters” to James and “love faxes” to Wade, which in reality are completely innocent notes and letters with no indication of Jackson’s interest in these children being sexual or romantic. The next time they met or even talked to Jackson again was more than two years later, in 1990, when, When you read Joy Robson’s deposition, Wade’s claims are simply absurd. Interestingly, this allegation was left out of the documentary, but in his complaint we read that Jackson has allegedly shown him No movies with children masturbating or any kind of child pornography has ever been found in Jackson’s possession. They tried to get access to highly private information about Spence, such as his sexual and medical history.In a motion where Spence opposed Robson’s strong-arm tactics to depose him without any sign of willing to compromise on the date when Spence could be available for a deposition, among other things, we read [38]:Both Barnes and Culkin adamantly deny any sexual abuse by Jackson.
How are you fighting for the “truth” by lying in court, to achieve the monetary compensation that you desire?The illusion of “parallel” stories is mostly created through the very prominent theme of “grooming” in the film. They may not get directly paid for Reed’s film, but they use it to assist their lawsuits that they have filed against Jackson’s companies for big monetary compensations, and that is currently in front of the appeals court.
Please review our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.Add HBO Max™ to any Hulu plan for an additional 14.99/month.Due to streaming rights, a few shows play with an ad break before and after. )This song (demo), written in 1999 and also unreleased during Jackson’s lifetime, touches on the issue of child sexual abuse as well.Even in Robson and Safechuck’s own allegations there are stories which contradict their claim that they never realized it was abuse until they became fathers, because Jackson had brainwashed them into thinking it was an expression of love.Take for example the story of Robson’s alleged coaching by Jackson on the phone.