Juvenile Delinquency -- Its Prevention and Control (Russell Sage Foundation, 1966).92 N.J.Rev.Stat. Then, not yet knowing to whom Lewis was speaking, Gault said, "I heard him, ahem, using some pretty vulgar language… so I – all I did was walk out, took the phone off him, hung it up, and told him – I said, 'Hey, there's the door. have the Assistance of Counsel in his defence. . United States courts of appeals may also make such decisions, particularly if the Supreme Court chooses not to review the case or if it adopts the holding of the lower court, such as in Smith v. Collin. That which would leave a man cold and unimpressed can overawe and overwhelm a lad in his early teens. Nonetheless, the judge entered an order that Gerald was delinquent, mandating his incarceration in a residential facility until he turned 21. .
ARS § 8-222. The charge listed in the report prepared by the county probation officers was "Lewd Phone Calls. 80-81.The Nat'l Crime Comm'n Report recommends that "Juvenile courts should make fullest feasible use of preliminary conferences to dispose of cases short of adjudication." . While due process requirements will, in some instances, introduce a degree of order and regularity to Juvenile Court proceedings to determine delinquency, and in contested cases will introduce some elements of the adversary system, nothing will require that the conception of the kindly juvenile judge be replaced by its opposite, nor do we here rule upon the question whether ordinary due process requirements must be observed with respect to hearings to determine the disposition of the delinquent child.Ultimately, however, we confront the reality of that portion of the Juvenile Court process with which we deal in this case. But with lawyers come records of proceedings; records make possible appeals which, even if they do not occur, impart by their possibility a healthy atmosphere of accountability. , but enough have been verified to fortify the conclusion, based on ordinary observation of human conduct, that, under certain stresses, a person, especially one of defective mentality or peculiar temperament, may falsely acknowledge guilt. The judge at the conclusion of the hearing said that he would “think about” what to do. The juvenile offender is now classed as a "delinquent." "Certainly these figures and the high crime rates among juveniles to which we have referred ( told that one of the important benefits of the special juvenile court procedures is that they avoid classifying the juvenile as a "criminal." [ of Juvenile Court laws has been sustained in over 40 jurisdictions against a variety of attacks. For application of the due process requirement of adequate notice in a criminal context, Mrs. Gault's "knowledge" of the charge against Gerald, and/or the asserted failure to object, does not excuse the lack of adequate notice. "The failure of the police to notify this child's parents that he had been taken into custody, if not alone sufficient to render his confession inadmissible, is germane on the issue of its voluntary character. I can't give you the section, but I can tell you the law, that when one person uses lewd language in the presence of another person, that it can amount to — and I consider that when a person makes it over the phone, that it is considered in the presence, I might be wrong, that is one section. I very much fear that this Court, by imposing these rigid procedural requirements, may inadvertently have served to discourage these efforts to find more satisfactory solutions for the problems of juvenile crime, and may thus now hamper enlightened development of the systems of juvenile courts. . The constitutional privilege against self-incrimination is applicable in such proceedings:"an admission by the juvenile may [not] be used against him in the absence of clear and unequivocal evidence that the admission was made with knowledge that he was not obliged to speak, and would not be penalized for remaining silent.
ARS § 8-222. The charge listed in the report prepared by the county probation officers was "Lewd Phone Calls. 80-81.The Nat'l Crime Comm'n Report recommends that "Juvenile courts should make fullest feasible use of preliminary conferences to dispose of cases short of adjudication." . While due process requirements will, in some instances, introduce a degree of order and regularity to Juvenile Court proceedings to determine delinquency, and in contested cases will introduce some elements of the adversary system, nothing will require that the conception of the kindly juvenile judge be replaced by its opposite, nor do we here rule upon the question whether ordinary due process requirements must be observed with respect to hearings to determine the disposition of the delinquent child.Ultimately, however, we confront the reality of that portion of the Juvenile Court process with which we deal in this case. But with lawyers come records of proceedings; records make possible appeals which, even if they do not occur, impart by their possibility a healthy atmosphere of accountability. , but enough have been verified to fortify the conclusion, based on ordinary observation of human conduct, that, under certain stresses, a person, especially one of defective mentality or peculiar temperament, may falsely acknowledge guilt. The judge at the conclusion of the hearing said that he would “think about” what to do. The juvenile offender is now classed as a "delinquent." "Certainly these figures and the high crime rates among juveniles to which we have referred ( told that one of the important benefits of the special juvenile court procedures is that they avoid classifying the juvenile as a "criminal." [ of Juvenile Court laws has been sustained in over 40 jurisdictions against a variety of attacks. For application of the due process requirement of adequate notice in a criminal context, Mrs. Gault's "knowledge" of the charge against Gerald, and/or the asserted failure to object, does not excuse the lack of adequate notice. "The failure of the police to notify this child's parents that he had been taken into custody, if not alone sufficient to render his confession inadmissible, is germane on the issue of its voluntary character. I can't give you the section, but I can tell you the law, that when one person uses lewd language in the presence of another person, that it can amount to — and I consider that when a person makes it over the phone, that it is considered in the presence, I might be wrong, that is one section. I very much fear that this Court, by imposing these rigid procedural requirements, may inadvertently have served to discourage these efforts to find more satisfactory solutions for the problems of juvenile crime, and may thus now hamper enlightened development of the systems of juvenile courts. . The constitutional privilege against self-incrimination is applicable in such proceedings:"an admission by the juvenile may [not] be used against him in the absence of clear and unequivocal evidence that the admission was made with knowledge that he was not obliged to speak, and would not be penalized for remaining silent.